Neolithic Cursi. The Forgotten Link Between The Earth, Sky and Stonehenge Ancient Sacred Geometry.

Neolithic Cursi in the UK: Linear Mysteries Dug Deep from the Distant Past.

Hello everyone, and welcome to another deep dive into the Neolithic from the Stone Temple Garden, where we dig deep to cultivate fresh insights into the ancient past!

In my previous posts, I’ve explored iconic sites like Stonehenge, Avebury, Glastonbury, and various captivating theories—ranging from Stonehenge’s geological roots to the astronomical mysteries of Avebury. Today, we’ll venture into lesser known yet equally fascinating territory: the enigmatic Cursi of Neolithic Britain. These monumental earthworks, scattered across the UK and Ireland, are some of the largest prehistoric constructions ever attempted. Despite their size, many remain hidden from view, ploughed under or obscured by time. A remarkable example can still be seen at Stonehenge, though another, lesser-known Cursus in the area is harder to access. This post started off as a quick examination of a neglected area of Neolithic monuments, the Cursi. But as I got into it it turned into a 4000+ words! There is a lot in here so here is a guide to what is ahead.

• Intoduction

• What’s a Cursus, Anyway?

• A Journey Through Some of Britain’s Most Notable Cursi

  • 1. The Dorset Cursus

  • 2. The Stonehenge Cursus

  • 3. The Cleaven Dyke Cursus (Scotland)

  • 4. The Milton Cursus (Cambridgeshire)

  • 5. The Rudston Cursi (East Yorkshire)

• Astronomical Alignments: A Gateway to the Stars?

• The Greater Stonehenge Cursus

• Ritual Pits and Celestial Alignments

• Proposed Woodhenge Alignment

• Mathematical Relationship Between the Cursus and Stonehenge

• Connections to Sacred Geometry

• The Great Pyramid of Giza (Egypt)

• Temple of Apollo at Delphi (Greece)

• Connections to Pythagoras and Ancient Mathematics

• Practical Example of the 6:5 Ratio

• Understanding of Proportions

• Astronomy at the Dorset Cursus

• Astronomy of the Rudston Cursi

• What Do These Alignments Tell Us?

• The Discovery of the 6:5 Ratio

• Conclusion: Why Were Cursi Built?

 What’s a Cursus Anyway?

Imagine a colossal earthwork stretching for kilometres, composed of two parallel banks and ditches that form a linear pathway across the landscape. That’s a Cursus —a type of huge Neolithic monument whose purpose is one of archaeology’s enduring mysteries. These structures vary greatly in length (from hundreds of meters to several kilometres) and width (30 to 100 meters). But what were they for? That’s still up for debate.

William Stukeley the Father of Field Archology

The term Cursus was first coined by the 18th-century antiquarian and father of field archelogy

William Stukeley, who compared the Stonehenge Cursus to a Roman chariot racetrack. Although this theory has long been dismissed, the true function of these earthworks remains speculative. Some archaeologists suggest that Cursi were ceremonial pathways, while others think they served as boundary markers, hunting enclosures, or even astronomical observatories aligned with celestial events. Another theory posits that they represented symbolic paths to the afterlife, reflecting connections to the Milky Way. Certainly, they were enormous feats of engineering and, as we shall see in at least one case, miraculous achievements in surveying and mathematical precision.

However, in the words of the spoof rock band Spinal Tap in their ode to the builders of Stonehenge: “Nobody knows who they were… or what they were doing…”—a bit of satire, but not far from the truth when it comes to Cursi.

 A Journey Through Some of Britain’s Most Notable Cursi.

 1. The Dorset Cursus

- Location: Cranborne Chase, Dorset

- Length: Over 10 km (6 ¼ miles)

- Width: 70-100 meters

The Topography of the Dorset Cursus

The Dorset Cursus is one of the longest and most imposing examples of Cursi in Britain, cutting as it does through Cranborne Chase and crossing valleys and rivers on its journey. Built around 3300 BCE, its enormous scale suggests it was a pivotal ceremonial or ritual structure. Archaeologists have noted that the Cursus interacts with the landscape, aligning with several contemporary long barrows (the earliest Neolithic burial mounds) along its path. This relationship hints at ancestor worship or funeral rites, suggesting the Cursus may have been used for ceremonial processions related to death and the afterlife.

The Dorset Cursus is Mostly Invisible Today

Interestingly, the long axis of the Cursus aligns closely with the direction of the Summer and winter Solstices. During the summer Solstice, the Sun rises at its northernmost point in the east and sets at its northernmost point in the west, and the cursus likely directs observers toward these solar events. Similarly, for the winter Solstice, the Sun rises and sets at its southernmost points, which may also align with key points along the cursus. The staggering effort required to construct this earthwork—estimated at 500,000 worker-hours—underscores its importance to the Neolithic people.

The Greater Cursus Near Stonehenge

 2. The Stonehenge Cursus

- Length: 2.8 km (1.75 miles)

- Width: 100 meters

Near the world-famous Stonehenge stands the Greater Cursus, a mysterious earthwork that predates the stone circle by several hundred years. Built between 3630 and 3375 BCE, this linear monument runs northeast southwest, and its alignments suggest it had astronomical significance. The northeast end of the Cursus aligns with the rising Sun during the Summer Solstice, while the southwest end is aligned with the Sunset on the Winter Solstice. Ritual pits dug into the Cursus also align to the Solstices. These Solstitial connections imply that the Cursus may have been part of broader solar observances, guiding rituals that were tied to the agricultural calendar or even beliefs about life and death.

In addition to solar alignments, archaeologists have discovered ritual pits at both ends of the Stonehenge Cursus, which may have served as markers or focal points for ceremonial activities. The positioning of these pits and their proximity to other Neolithic monuments suggest that the Cursus played a role in navigating a sacred landscape, potentially representing a boundary or processional route within an area marked by celestial events. And finally, it has been suggested that the mathematical relationship between Stonehenge and the Greater Cursus shows the builders planning and surveying skills were highly developed. More on this later.

 3. The Cleaven Dyke Cursus (Scotland)

- Length: 2 km (1.25 miles)

- Width: 50 meters

The Cleaven Dyke Cursus

The Cleaven Dyke Cursus, one of the best-preserved Cursi in Scotland, presents a clear linear path across the landscape, emphasizing the connection between these earthworks and their surroundings. It is orientated northwest/southeast with four deliberate breaks making five sections with at least 28 irregular sub sections.  It has been suggested these may have been an annual event. There are possible links to the construction method of contemporary Causeway Enclosures like Windmill Hill near Avebury. Francis Pryor suggests that the sectional construction of the banks and ditches may have been built by families over time. Several barrows also appeared to be incorporated within the Dyke. The monument was at its tallest and broadest at the NW terminal, and here, it appeared to be formed by an oval mound on an E-W axis, measuring 28m wide by 22m long. Attached to the east end of this, a long barrow runs SE for 80m. The flanking ditches of the cursus monument accompany neither this oval mound or long barrow, starting only around 90m down from the NW terminal of the monument, and it is here that the cursus monument begins ‘proper’. A third possible barrow appears to have been incorporated into Section C of the Dyke, which terminates at its SE end with a long mound 88m long, and oval swelling 14m wide by 23m long, very much mirroring the NW terminal of the monument.  Like many other Cursi, Cleaven Dyke may have been used for ritual purposes linked to funeral rites and processions, marking the movement of people in a ceremonial context.

Though it has not been confirmed whether this Cursus aligns with any astronomical events, its long form invites speculation about its symbolic purpose. Some archaeologists believe it could represent the journey of the soul, a processional way to the afterlife—similar to how the Milky Way was viewed as a celestial river guiding spirits to the heavens by the Egyptians.

 4. The Milton Cursus (Cambridgeshire)

- Length: 500 meters

- Width: 30 meters

An Artistic Impression of Milton Cursus

Smaller than many of its counterparts, the Milton Cursus in Cambridgeshire may have been more closely tied to local Neolithic communities. Its proximity to settlement sites suggests it could have served as a territorial boundary or a ceremonial route for community-specific rituals.

Though no firm astronomical alignments have been identified, its modest size suggests a possible connection to more practical or immediate purposes in daily spiritual life—perhaps rites linked to fertility, the seasons, or the agricultural calendar.

 5. The Rudston Cursi (East Yorkshire)

- Location: Rudston, East Yorkshire

- Notable Feature: Proximity to the Rudston Monolith, the tallest standing stone in Britain

The Rudston complex is remarkable, featuring four Cursi clustered near the towering Rudston Monolith, a Neolithic standing stone over 7.5 meters (25.6 feet) tall. This combination of Cursi and a massive standing stone hints at a ceremonial centre of great importance. One, labelled rather  dryly “Cursus A”, aligns with the Solstices. Each Cursus may have served a distinct function, possibly evolving over time as the rituals and beliefs of the local community changed.

The proximity to the Rudston Monolith and the sheer scale of the earthworks suggest that celestial alignments may have played a role here as well, with the Cursi marking significant solar or lunar events, or perhaps even symbolizing pathways for the dead toward the stars and the ancestors in the afterlife.

 Astronomical Alignments: A Gateway to the Stars?

One of the most compelling theories about Cursi is their potential alignment with celestial events, particularly the movements of the Sun. Across the UK, many Cursi appear to be oriented toward the rising or setting Sun during the Solstices, suggesting that these earthworks were more than simple pathways—they may have functioned as solar observatories, aligning ritual practices with the rhythm of the heavens.

 The Greater Stonehenge Cursus is the most famous example of these celestial alignments. Running approximately 2.8 kilometres, it aligns in a northeast-southwest direction. This orientation is no coincidence—its northeast end is aligned with the rising Sun on the Summer Solstice, while its southwest end aligns with the Winter Solstice Sunset. These Solstitial connections strongly imply that the Stonehenge Cursus was involved in ceremonies linked to the changing seasons, possibly marking important dates in the agricultural calendar, such as planting and harvesting times. This suggests a deep relationship between the landscape, the heavens, and the seasonal cycles that governed Neolithic life.

Adding to its mystery are the ritual pits discovered at both ends of the Stonehenge Cursus. These pits, likely dug as part of ceremonies or to hold offerings, may have served as focal points for rituals. One of the most intriguing aspects of these pits is their potential alignment with Stonehenge, especially with celestial events. Archaeological evidence suggests that the pits could have been used to frame or mark key astronomical alignments. The pit at the eastern end appears to be aligned with the rising Sun at the Summer Solstice, while the western pit may be aligned with the setting Sun during the Winter Solstice. These alignments echo the solar orientations later seen at Stonehenge, where the monument is famously aligned with the Midsummer Sunrise and Midwinter Sunset. Positioned at the terminal points of the Cursus, they could have anchored ceremonies in both time and space, marking key moments in the solar year. The presence of these pits near the Cursus suggests that this earthwork wasn’t just a boundary or processional route, but an integral part of sacred rites related to life, death, and the Sun's journey across the sky.

English Heritage Sign at The Greater Cursus

Finally, there are suggestions of an alignment between the Greater Cursus and the nearby Woodhenge, a long rotted wooden monument at the nearby Durrington Walls Henge monument (awaiting a post from me – very important site) and a revealing mathematical relationship between the Cursus and the later Stonehenge itself, that suggests advanced surveying skills.

Proposed Woodhenge Alignment:

 Some scholars have pointed out that the Cursus and Woodhenge might be aligned with each other, suggesting that they could have been part of a broader ceremonial or ritual landscape, possibly linked to the celestial events or processions. Woodhenge, which is located just a couple of miles from Stonehenge, is believed to have been a wooden counterpart to the stone circle, and its connection to other monuments has been speculated on. See https://jqjacobs.net/archaeology/stonehenge_cursus.html

The article specifically mentions that this supposed alignment between the Cursus and Woodhenge is "off by degrees," meaning that any direct alignment between the two monuments is not precise. For many this imprecision casts doubt on the idea that they were purposefully aligned for astronomical or ritual purposes. In archaeology, even a small degree of misalignment can challenge such theories because celestial alignments need to be highly accurate to have significant meaning. The reference to the Cursus-Woodhenge alignment is used as an example of how such interpretations can be speculative, especially when they are based on weak or inaccurate data. The author implies that just because two monuments appear to be roughly aligned doesn’t necessarily mean there was intentionality behind it, particularly when the alignment isn’t exact. However, while agreeing with this, I am also open minded to broader alignments having significance. It seems to me that a frame is potentially as likely as a precise alignment. That said, I understand the modern scientific “Thom like” demand for precise alignments. They do remove some of the scepticism, although even when precise many then go on to call them coincidence! As I said, I get it. But this blog is not an academic exercise, so we can be a little more generous in our interpretations while remembering their limitations. The alignment with Woodhenge is unproven, but not necessarily negated.

Sacred Geometry at Stonehenge

The article also mentions an intriguing (and precise) mathematical relationship between the Great Cursus and the later Stonehenge, namely a 6:5 ratio between the two sites. This refers to a mathematical relationship found between the distances of key points within the Stonehenge landscape, particularly involving the Cursus and Stonehenge itself. Here’s why this ratio is significant.

The researcher found that the arc distance (measured in degrees along the Earth's surface) from Stonehenge to the western terminus of the Greater Cursus and the arc distance to its eastern terminus formed a 6:5 ratio. Specifically, the arc distance to the western end of the Cursus is 0.01338 degrees, and to the eastern end is 0.016056 degrees, making the difference between these distances close to a 6:5 ratio. Intentional? Well, we are into the “Thom Like” precision paradigm. However, if deliberate, this ratio suggests that Neolithic builders may have used geometric principles or a consistent proportional system in laying out these monuments. It hints at the possibility that the placement of these structures relative to each other was not random, but rather followed a specific plan or design. This has implications undermining the general perception that the builders surveying skills were “primitive.”

The 6:5 Ratio Between Stonehenge and The Greater Cursus

A 6:5 ratio, if intentional, implies a high level of surveying or measuring capability among the people who constructed these monuments. This would mean that Neolithic builders had a strong understanding of geometry and were capable of planning large-scale constructions with a sense of proportion and distance that incorporated natural mathematical relationships. The ability to calculate arc distances—the measurement of a segment of Earth's surface in degrees between two points—shows that they were thinking not just in straight lines but in terms of the Earth’s curvature, indicating a deep spatial awareness.

Connections to Sacred Geometry:

The 6:5 ratio is a simple mathematical relationship where for every 6 units of one measure, there are 5 units of another. This proportional relationship can be interpreted in several ways depending on the context, but it often refers to harmonic balance between two forces or dimensions, such as between heaven and earth, or spirit and matter.

In sacred geometry, the significance of this ratio is found in various ancient structures, where the dimensions and layout of the buildings are thought to encode spiritual or cosmological meaning. The 6:5 ratio can also be linked to:

Harmony in architectural design.

The balance between different elements (earth, water, air, fire, spirit).

The Pythagorean concept of harmonics and music, where proportions determine the harmony of sounds.

The Great Pyramid of Giza (Egypt)

Sacred Geometry at the Pyramids of Giza

The design of the Great Pyramid incorporates multiple sacred geometric proportions, including the Golden Ratio and the Pi ratio, but some studies have suggested that the pyramid's base-to-height ratios might reflect variations of the 6:5 principle. In its broader geometrical context, this ratio could represent the relationship between the square base (representing the earth) and the height (representing the connection to the heavens).

The precision of the pyramid’s layout suggests that these mathematical relationships were intentional, meant to mirror celestial harmonics and the balance between physical and spiritual dimensions.

Temple of Apollo at Delphi (Greece)

The Temple of Apollo at Delphi is also noted for its adherence to sacred geometric proportions. The 6:5 ratio might relate to how the temple's inner sanctum (or adyton) was proportioned in relation to its exterior. Delphi, being the centre of the ancient world, was thought to reflect a microcosm of the universe, and such proportions would have been significant in showing the balance between the divine (6, associated with perfection) and the human (5, often seen as the number of humanity).

Connections to Pythagoras and Ancient Mathematics

Pythagoras Sacred Geometry

The ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras heavily influenced sacred geometry. His teachings, which revolved around the idea that "all is number," reveal how proportions like 6:5 was understood in terms of musical harmonics and cosmic order.

The Pythagorean Tuning System emphasizes harmonic ratios between notes, and one such harmonic ratio is 6:5, representing the interval between musical notes that are consonant (specifically, a minor third). This may suggest that ancient architects employed the same principles when designing structures to create a harmonious, resonant experience for those interacting with the space.

Practical Example of the 6:5 Ratio

If we apply this ratio to architectural design, it could mean that for every 6 units of height, there would be 5 units of width. This kind of proportional system was common in the design of temples, pyramids, and even ancient cities, where the layout and size of various structures followed harmonic principles.

This type of design was not just aesthetically pleasing but was believed to connect the architecture to the heavens—as though the buildings themselves were in resonance with cosmic forces.

The 6:5 ratio in sacred geometry is an example of how ancient civilizations infused their architecture and designs with mathematical and symbolic meaning. Whether through the dimensions of temples, pyramids, or stone circles, this ratio embodies a deep cosmic harmony that reflects both spiritual and earthly dimensions. By using such proportions, ancient builders sought to create spaces that would act as bridges between the human and divine, material and immaterial worlds.

The enduring mystery and appeal of sites like the Great Pyramid of Giza, Stonehenge, and Delphi lie in their encoded sacred proportions, which still resonate with seekers of esoteric knowledge today. What is more it suggests that ancient builders of Stonehenge, like the later classical Greeks, used specific proportions based on nature or the cosmos in their designs. If true, this could link the cursus and Stonehenge to broader cosmological or ritual beliefs projecting forward from the Neolithic into the present, where these geometric relationships symbolized or represented something important, such as the alignment with celestial bodies natural landmarks and cosmic harmony.

The 6:5 ratio suggests that there might be a deliberate design behind the positioning of the Stonehenge Cursus and its connection to Stonehenge, reflecting sophisticated surveying or symbolic thinking in the Neolithic period.

Understanding of Proportions:

The use of ratios like 6:5 hints at an understanding of proportional relationships that goes beyond basic construction. It suggests that Neolithic builders may have used such proportions to express ideas about balance, harmony, or order in their environment, aligning their constructions in ways that reflect these principles. It could also suggest that the builders were aware of and purposefully applied a modular system of measurement, where different parts of the monument landscape were laid out in harmonious proportion to each other, possibly reflecting broader ideas about social structure, cosmology, or land use.

The cursus, being a large ceremonial earthwork, may have been laid out with this ratio to serve a ritual or processional function, guiding people or marking significant events like solstices, equinoxes, or other ceremonial times. The proportional spacing might have been part of the symbolic journey or procession within the landscape, connecting sacred sites like Stonehenge with other nearby features.

Astronomy at the Dorset Cursus.

The Dorset Cursus, which stretches over 10 kilometres across the landscape, also shows signs of astronomical alignment. The Cursus runs east-west, and although it doesn't have the same direct Solstitial alignments as the Stonehenge Cursus, its orientation suggests that the builders were highly aware of the movement of the Sun across the horizon. Some researchers have suggested that it might have been used to observe the Sunrise and Sunset at equinoxes, important turning points in the agricultural year when day and night are in balance.

In addition to these solar alignments, the Dorset Cursus interacts with several Neolithic long barrows , ancient burial mounds scattered along its path. Many of these barrows are positioned to face east, toward the rising Sun, symbolizing the renewal of life and the journey of the soul toward the afterlife. This connection between the long barrows and the Cursus indicates that the earthwork likely had a funerary role, guiding ceremonial processions from the realm of the living toward the resting places of the dead. The alignment of the barrows with the Sunrise reinforces the idea that these monuments were tied to both the solar cycle and the spiritual journey of the deceased, linking death with rebirth.

Another fascinating possibility is that the Cursi may have been aligned not just with the Sun, but also with the Milky Way, which many ancient cultures viewed as a celestial river or road to the afterlife. This fringe theory posits that the long, linear shape of the Cursi could represent a symbolic pathway for the soul, guiding the dead from their earthly resting places to the stars. The connection between the orientation of long barrows and the Cursus, along with the potential for celestial alignments, strengthens this interpretation. In this view, Cursi were not just terrestrial monuments but cosmic ones, bridging the gap between the earth and the heavens. For more on the importance of the Milky Way at Avebury, see my post here. The Neolithic World and the Astronomy of Avebury Stone Circle, Silbury Hill, West Kennet Long Barrow, The Sanctury and Longstones Cove. Part 2.

The Rudston Cursi

In the case of Rudston’s Cursi in East Yorkshire, there is clear evidence that the placement of the earthworks and the nearby Rudston Monolith—Britain’s tallest standing stone—were part of a complex ritual landscape. The presence of multiple Cursi near such a significant monument suggests that these structures were not built in isolation but were part of larger ceremonial networks that integrated celestial and terrestrial elements. The combination of the Cursi with the standing stone may have created a focal point for rituals tied to both the earth and the stars, reinforcing the spiritual significance of the site. The most detailed suggestion of such alignments comes from research into the nearby "C" cursus, where it has been proposed that the monument may have been part of a larger ceremonial landscape, possibly with connections to solar or lunar cycles. One important idea is that the cursus itself might have been aligned east-to-west, which could indicate a deliberate alignment with celestial events like the equinoxes. It has also been pointed out that Cursus “A” is aligned with the Solstices. This suggests that the builders may have been marking significant solar events through the alignment of their monumental structures ​(The Northern Antiquarian)

Rudston Monolith

What Do These Alignments Tell Us?

The alignment of Cursi with the Solstices, the orientation of long barrows toward the rising Sun, and the presence of ritual pits all suggest that these monumental earthworks were deeply connected to both the cosmos and the spiritual lives of Neolithic people. While their exact function remains speculative, the ceremonial and astronomical significance of Cursi seems undeniable. They may have served as sacred processional routes, guiding rituals tied to the movement of the Sun and the stars, or as symbolic pathways for the dead, linking the earthly world with the afterlife.

The effort required to construct these monumental earthworks, often over several kilometres, indicates that they were of great importance to the communities that built them. The combination of solar alignments, burial practices, and ceremonial pits suggests that Cursi were part of a broader ritual landscape, one that integrated human life, death, and the movements of the heavens. Whether they were guiding the dead to the stars or marking key moments in the agricultural calendar, Cursi stand as powerful symbols of a worldview that saw the earth and sky as deeply interconnected.

In short, these linear monuments seem to have been carefully placed in the landscape to interact with both the terrestrial world and the celestial realm. As we continue to study these enigmatic structures, we may uncover even more connections between the Neolithic people, their sacred landscapes, and the stars they revered.

The discovery of the 6:5 ratio in the relationship between the Stonehenge Cursus and other key features in the Stonehenge landscape suggests that the Neolithic builders possessed a sophisticated understanding of geometry and surveying techniques. This ratio, found in the arc distances from Stonehenge to the western and eastern termini of the Cursus, indicates that the placement of these monuments was not random but part of a deliberate and well-planned design. The ability to measure arc distances across the Earth’s surface, even with rudimentary tools, demonstrates an impressive spatial awareness and an advanced knowledge of the natural world, particularly regarding the curvature of the Earth.

This ratio reveals that the builders were not merely creating structures for practical purposes, but they may have been engaging in a process of symbolic construction, using proportional relationships to express their understanding of the world. The 6:5 ratio suggests that the cursus and its relationship to other monuments, such as Woodhenge, were likely part of a ritualistic or ceremonial landscape, where these geometric alignments carried deeper spiritual or symbolic meanings. The cursus, stretching over a long distance, might have been designed to connect significant features of the landscape, possibly marking processional routes or ritual journeys between sacred sites.

Conclusion: Why Were Cursi Built?

While their exact function remains speculative, the ceremonial significance of Cursi seems undeniable. Their construction—requiring enormous labour over extended periods—suggests they were more than simple pathways or boundaries. Theories range from ritual processional routes and territorial markers to astronomical observatories and symbolic pathways for the dead. Though often invisible to the naked eye today, these ancient earthworks remind us of a time when the land was imbued with sacred meaning. Cursi represent the intersection of sky and earth, life and death, and the mysteries of the universe as seen through the eyes of Neolithic people. Whether they were guiding the dead to the stars, marking sacred boundaries, or aligning with the Sun’s eternal dance, the Cursi remain powerful symbols of a world deeply connected to nature and the cosmos. The geometrics encoded at Stonehenge hint at the mystery of the origins of sacred geometry and how they existed long before the Eygyption and classical periods. These insights left in the landscape wisper from the past secrets on the harmony of Earth, Sky and Spirit woven through the monuments and world views of the ancients.

As we continue to unearth new clues, one thing is certain: these ancient monuments still have stories to tell, even if some remain shrouded in mystery.

---

I hope this deep dive into the nature of the neglected Neolithic Cursi has sparked your curiosity. Next time you visit Stonehenge or other ancient sites, remember—the landscape itself may hold secrets that are just waiting to be uncovered.

Until next time, stay curious, and keep exploring the mysteries of our ancient past!

 For more on the ancient landscapes surrounding Stonehenge, check out my earlier posts on the Stonehenge Avenue glacial striations and the Blick Mead sacred spring that influenced its siting on Salibury Plain.